NP: The Colbert Report
So, Lifehacker points out that Wired points out how you can see who is behind anonymous Wikipedia edits, and then Fox News, The New York Times and Diebold all get fingered. I'm guessing the two are somehow related.
The more amusing angle is that the Fark.com entries were "obvious" for Fox News and Diebold, but "asinine" for the New York Times. I think that is somehow revealing, although I'm not sure exactly what.
I have a hunch this is going to turn into a mammoth crowdsourcing effort, and that these three examples will be just the tip of the iceberg. It's the first Web 2.0 scandal! Maybe!
notabbott.com is not spamming you -- please read
however, if you'd like e-mails about upcoming shows and whatnot, click here
Dead To Rights
November 20, 2008
From Ashton's Lips to God's Ears
November 20, 2008
Happy Life Day!
November 20, 2008
Modern Fact-Checking
November 20, 2008
All content on this website (including text, photographs, audio files, and any other original works), unless otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons License.