October 31, 2004
Idle Second-Guessing
NP: Mike Keneally Band, Dog
I'm reading Slate's take on Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and why Bush didn't go after him before the war, and it dawned on me. Not only has the war "that has been brought upon us" in Iraq (that Ari Fleischer was so adorable!) launched on flimsy pretenses, but it could have been pulled off in a way that actually didn't take the "eye off the ball" with regard to the War on Terror.
Seriously, why couldn't Bush have attacked al-Zarqawi's camp in Northern Iraq in an effort to both take care of a known terrorist and provoke Iraq into a response that would then justify his removal? Or at least demand Hussein serve him up and then use that as justification (de facto harboring of terrorists) if/when he refused?
Comments
Post a comment
about notabbott.com
what is it?
notabbott.com is not spamming you -- please read
however, if you'd like e-mails about upcoming shows and whatnot, click here
search
recent entries in MAIN
A Win Is A Win
November 3, 2011
November 3, 2011
How We Got Here
October 30, 2011
The Media Vacuum, Defined
October 30, 2011
Pre-writing History
September 16, 2011
Finishing The Sentence
September 7, 2011
archives by month
November 2011
1 posts
October 2011
2 posts
September 2011
3 posts
August 2011
2 posts
July 2011
1 posts
June 2011
3 posts
COMPLETE MONTHLY ARCHIVES
1 posts
October 2011
2 posts
September 2011
3 posts
August 2011
2 posts
July 2011
1 posts
June 2011
3 posts
COMPLETE MONTHLY ARCHIVES
credits
All content on this website (including text, photographs, audio files, and any other original works), unless otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
